Council postpones vote on Flemington redevelopment plan

FLEMINGTON — In a extremely anticipated assembly relating to Flemington’s present redevelopment plan, council members motioned to desk the vote on the plan till Dec. eleven.

In an effort to incorporate council member-elects within the determination making course of, 4 council members supported the movement proposed by Councilwoman Brooke Liebowitz to postpone the vote.

Betsy Driver and Michael Harris, robust supporters of maintaining the Union Lodge, defeated incumbents Brian Swingle and Kim Tilly in final week’s election.

“We will push this by means of, we’ve the votes, however I do not assume that is the fitting approach to deal with issues,” she stated whereas reiterating her help for developer Jack Cust’s challenge.

2 factors of view on Flemington’s redevelopment of Union Lodge space

She additionally famous there was “loads of misinformation” through the marketing campaign, elevating residents’ considerations. 

Council members Marc Hain, Susan Peterson and John Gorman supported her movement, whereas Swingle abstained from voting and Tilly voted no.

“Get everyone on the identical web page as a lot as we will and convey the brand new individuals on board,” Liebowitz stated.

She promised dialogue through the month, with Driver and Harris invited to government periods, pending conflicts, together with already scheduled transition conferences.

A number of the 70 attendees applauded, others groaned loudly on the lack of vote, an instance of the divide many say is seen in Flemington.

“The infighting should cease or nothing will get accomplished,” stated one resident.

Harris stated there was no level to holding the vote till Dec. eleven. He stated the vote ought to have been Monday or held till January.

Mayor Phil Greiner additionally opposed the delay, noting, “everybody has recognized this assembly is coming, and this vote.”

In the course of the two public remark periods, some attendees spoke out towards the undertaking, expressing considerations over visitors, road parking, the antiquated sewage system, value of the challenge and historic preservation.

Borough resident Robert Shore referred to as the election a “referendum on this improvement,” stating the election outcomes point out the course the city needs to go in. 

Supporters of Cust’s undertaking opposed the choice to postpone the vote, fearful Cust might pull out or the lodge might quickly turn out to be a security hazard.

Others argued the redevelopment is essential for the city’s financial system.  

“It will take magic mud sprinkled over this…for it to be solved by December,” stated Greiner.

Sophie Nieto-Munoz could also be reached at Comply with her at @snietomunoz. Discover on Fb.

Have a tip? Inform us.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *